Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Edison Ambarzumjan vs Noah Perfetti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ambarzumjan vs Perfetti analysis and find out who is favored!
Edison Ambarzumjan vs Noah Perfetti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ambarzumjan 1 - 0 Perfetti
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ambarzumjan has won 49.34% of points on their second serve, while Perfetti has won 49.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ambarzumjan, in recent form, has won 51.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Perfetti has won 54.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.24% and 41.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ambarzumjan has saved 66.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Perfetti has saved 53.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ambarzumjan has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 16), with Perfetti winning 63.29% (W/L 50/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Perfetti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 55/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16), where as Perfetti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.29% of matches (W/L 50/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ambarzumjan winning 1 times and Perfetti being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ambarzumjan winning 2 and Perfetti winning 0. The last match between Ambarzumjan and Perfetti was at the M15 San Gregorio di Catania, 27-11-2023, Q3, Clay with Edison Ambarzumjan getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ambarzumjan and Perfetti have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ambarzumjan winning 0 times and Perfetti 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ambarzumjan winning 0, and Perfetti 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ambarzumjan has played against opponents with an average rank of 60.81 while Perfetti has played against players with an average rank of 105.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ambarzumjan has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Perfetti has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ambarzumjan has converted 40.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Perfetti has converted 48.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
52% (44-41)
Career Total W/L
58% (62-44)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
68% (36-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ambarzumjan VS Perfetti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Edison Ambarzumjan | Noah Perfetti |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ambarzumjan VS Perfetti H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Edison Ambarzumjan | Noah Perfetti |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 68% (36/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 65% (78/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (316/276) | 57% (627/478) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 70% (35/15) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 19 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:13:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 53.08 | 149.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (601/1059) | 73% (1663/2288) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (425/601) | 59% (979/1663) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (226/458) | 50% (311/625) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (36/89) | 48% (148/308) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (394/1041) | 46% (1106/2399) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (16/10) | 68% (36/17) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 67% (35/52) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 85% (33/28) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 15% (33/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 40% (20/8) |
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Maik Steiner
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
124)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
33 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(7) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Aaron Gil Garcia
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Rafael Ymer
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 7-6(3) 16-14 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Noah Perfetti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Noah Perfetti
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Matic Dimic
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Noah Perfetti
57%
(
69 of
121)
1st Serve %
77%
(
70 of
91)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
56 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Noah Perfetti
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Marco Furlanetto
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Francesco Cartocci
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Noah Perfetti
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Silvio Mencaglia
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Noah Perfetti
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Stijn Pel
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ambarzumjan Vs Perfetti Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ambarzumjan are available here and Perfetti photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
